| Title |
Ants farm subterranean aphids mostly in single clone groups - an example of prudent husbandry for carbohydrates and proteins?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-12-106 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aniek BF Ivens, Daniel JC Kronauer, Ido Pen, Franz J Weissing, Jacobus J Boomsma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 16% |
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 62% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,236,026
of 25,901,238 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#556
of 3,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,278
of 178,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#8
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,901,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.