| Title |
Enlarging smaller images before inputting into convolutional neural network: zero-padding vs. interpolation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Big Data, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40537-019-0263-7 |
| Authors |
Mahdi Hashemi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 215 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 95 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 64 | 30% |
| Engineering | 25 | 12% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 97 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,010,999
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Big Data
#101
of 367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,741
of 364,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Big Data
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.