@englishspecial It was only dropped as independent source of load (likely in the 2010 article https://t.co/JkLQg1y4nY) and is now subsumed under the other load types as redistribution mechanism. Unclear how? Yes, it has just moved the problem, not addresse
@alban_dasilva2 @matthieu_lahaye Article de 2007. Qu'en reste-t-il 17 ans plus tard? La théorie a continué de s'imposer depuis. Elle s'est orientée vers la notion d'"élément interactivity" pour expliquer certains cas. https://t.co/DJAgDgpJxj
@bjfr In 2010, Sweller [https://t.co/Rgc9hnG1QT] crystalize some of the points raised by previous papers regarding the role of GL in CLT. Kalyuga's 2011 paper [https://t.co/DkXBNoQzhq] gets straight to the point: How Many Types of Load Does CLT Really Need
@greg_ashman @Stephen_Hurley @mpershan @MatthewOldridge @NumCog @NumCogLab @tombennett71 @Maloney_EA @rebeccammerkley @mwalibali @SRaaijmakers The second is the 'status' of germane load, which was introduced in 1998 but 'sworn off' again by Sweller et al.
Yess hebbes. I ♡ Twitter
Ik zou graag onderstaand artikel willen lezen, maar deze zit achter een paywall, kan iemand mij hieraan helpen 😇? Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load Sweller, J. Educ Psychol Rev (2010) 22: 123. https://t.co/XCwhWT
@Mr_AlmondED @Mr_N_Wood @EnserMark Sweller (2010) https://t.co/JkLQg1y4nY Kalyuga (2011) as well. Also see blog https://t.co/6RX8FWQjl1 for example. I think it was a mistake to do away with it. Claim ‘unfalsifiable’ imo still the case, and now ‘schemas’ ar
@ed_podesta @EnserMark @profbeckyallen @TeacherTapp Sweller thought it made CLT unfalsifiable. Was subsumed within intrinsic and extraneous load. See https://t.co/JkLQg1y4nY and https://t.co/vC0BzRUR5B
RT @cbokhove: @ChrisMWParsons @matthewslocombe @EdSacredProfane @CasperHuls @ryandal @englishspecial @woutervj @SRaaijmakers didn't you get…
@ChrisMWParsons @matthewslocombe @EdSacredProfane @CasperHuls @ryandal @englishspecial @woutervj @SRaaijmakers didn't you get the memo? 2010 and 2011 already in https://t.co/JkLQg1y4nY also see https://t.co/vC0BzRUR5B.
@matthewslocombe This is the result from in essence removing (although they say redefining I think) germane load in https://t.co/JkLQg1y4nY also see https://t.co/vC0BzRUR5B so it used to be a separate type of load’ re schemas but this was hard to measure..
Recall we had *THREE* types of load from what seems to be 1998. But then in 2010 Sweller ‘removed’ it again https://t.co/JkLQg1y4nY
@CasperHuls @sara_hjelm @charlotteraby This is an important moment in the timeline of CLT, 2010 https://t.co/JkLQg1y4nY At the moment I have 1982 first origins 1988 first use of term 1992 Paas scale 1998 most cited article on CLT 2003 expertise reversal 2
@olivercavigliol @ASTsupportAAli @atharby @jillberry102 @JulesDaulby @TheHopefulHT @FurtherEdagogy @EnserMark @MaryMyatt @ICTmagic @vicgoddard @LeadingLearner @MrsMathia @heymrshallahan Yes, he reframes it in https://t.co/JkLQg1y4nY also more in https://t.
@cbokhove @CasperHuls Sweller 2010: https://t.co/qhkTQZvgg0 I am not at all an expert in Cognitive Load Theory. I happen to use Miller’s working memory 7 ≠ 2, from the fifties ;-)
@FurtherEdagogy Yes https://t.co/T1rrVdmsR0 Idea is that germane load hard to verify/falsify as makes load 'not additive', after all, good schemas increase germane load but might lower extraneous load. Argument is by losing germane you can add up the two r
@ManYanaEd @suzyg001 The key pub is Sweller (2010) https://t.co/JkLQg1y4nY