↓ Skip to main content

Tracheostomy in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome is not related to quality of life, symptoms of psychiatric disorders or return-to-work: the prospective DACAPO cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Tracheostomy in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome is not related to quality of life, symptoms of psychiatric disorders or return-to-work: the prospective DACAPO cohort study
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13613-020-00671-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Blecha, Magdalena Brandl, Florian Zeman, Frank Dodoo-Schittko, Susanne Brandstetter, Christian Karagiannidis, Thomas Bein, Christian Apfelbacher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Unspecified 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 20 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Unspecified 5 9%
Psychology 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 23 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,998,621
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#896
of 1,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,145
of 415,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#30
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.