| Title |
One-year survival in acute stroke patients requiring mechanical ventilation: a multicenter cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00669-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Etienne de Montmollin, Nicolas Terzi, Claire Dupuis, Maité Garrouste-Orgeas, Daniel da Silva, Michaël Darmon, Virginie Laurent, Guillaume Thiéry, Johana Oziel, Guillaume Marcotte, Marc Gainnier, Shidasp Siami, Benjamin Sztrymf, Christophe Adrie, Jean Reignier, Stephane Ruckly, Romain Sonneville, Jean-François Timsit |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 7 | 37% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 53% |
| Scientists | 5 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 22 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,298,671
of 25,225,928 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#439
of 1,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,990
of 387,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#23
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,225,928 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.