↓ Skip to main content

Cellular automata modelling of slime mould actin network signalling

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Computing, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Cellular automata modelling of slime mould actin network signalling
Published in
Natural Computing, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11047-016-9559-0
Authors

Richard Mayne, Andrew Adamatkzy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 30%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Engineering 3 15%
Computer Science 2 10%
Materials Science 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,374,585
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Natural Computing
#84
of 144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,339
of 334,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Computing
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them