↓ Skip to main content

Supportive development of functional tissues for biomedical research using the MINUSHEET® perfusion system

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Medicine, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Supportive development of functional tissues for biomedical research using the MINUSHEET® perfusion system
Published in
Clinical and Translational Medicine, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/2001-1326-1-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Will W Minuth, Lucia Denk

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Master 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 17%
Engineering 3 10%
Materials Science 3 10%
Chemistry 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#337
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,383
of 191,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.