| Title |
Segmentation, Reconstruction, and Analysis of Blood Thrombus Formation in 3D 2-Photon Microscopy Images
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ADS, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1155/2010/147216 |
| Authors |
Jian Mu, Xiaomin Liu, Malgorzata M. Kamocka, Zhiliang Xu, Mark S. Alber, Elliot D. Rosen, Danny Z. Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Latvia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 35% |
| Researcher | 7 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 7 | 30% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 13% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#7,327
of 25,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,720
of 103,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#105
of 330 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 330 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.