| Title |
My avatar, my self: Virtual harm and attachment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ethics and Information Technology, October 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10676-006-9125-z |
| Authors |
Jessica Wolfendale |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 23% |
| Unknown | 29 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 37 | 22% |
| Psychology | 27 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 19 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 16 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 32 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,021,802
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Ethics and Information Technology
#75
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,671
of 67,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ethics and Information Technology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.