↓ Skip to main content

Secondary wind transport of radioactive materials after the Fukushima accident

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Secondary wind transport of radioactive materials after the Fukushima accident
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, February 2012
DOI 10.5047/eps.2012.01.002
Authors

M. Yamauchi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 42%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2017.
All research outputs
#14,281,005
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#733
of 1,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,530
of 158,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.