| Title |
Bedside prediction of intradialytic hemodynamic instability in critically ill patients: the SOCRATE study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00663-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Naïke Bigé, Jean-Rémi Lavillegrand, Julien Dang, Philippe Attias, Stéphanie Deryckere, Jérémie Joffre, Vincent Dubée, Gabriel Preda, Guillaume Dumas, Geoffroy Hariri, Claire Pichereau, Jean-Luc Baudel, Bertrand Guidet, Eric Maury, Pierre-Yves Boelle, Hafid Ait-Oufella |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 16 | 27% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 7% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Nicaragua | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 24% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,056,861
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#115
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,884
of 405,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.