↓ Skip to main content

Visual chunking as a strategy for spatial thinking in STEM

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Visual chunking as a strategy for spatial thinking in STEM
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41235-020-00217-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mike Stieff, Stephanie Werner, Dane DeSutter, Steve Franconeri, Mary Hegarty

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Lecturer 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Master 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 32 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 13%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Psychology 7 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Mathematics 2 3%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 34 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2020.
All research outputs
#14,478,822
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#246
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,399
of 374,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.