| Title |
Genetically modified Caenorhabditis elegans may lead to inaccurate toxicity evaluation of mixtures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Sciences Europe, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12302-020-00337-2 |
| Authors |
Peng Huang, Kai Li, Ya-Qian Xu, Ze-Jun Wang, Shu-Shen Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 33% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2020.
All research outputs
#15,808,700
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#332
of 606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,296
of 347,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#18
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.