↓ Skip to main content

Co-estimation of geomagnetic field and in-orbit fluxgate magnetometer calibration parameters

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Co-estimation of geomagnetic field and in-orbit fluxgate magnetometer calibration parameters
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40623-020-01163-9
Authors

Patrick Alken, Nils Olsen, Christopher C. Finlay

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 28%
Engineering 3 17%
Physics and Astronomy 2 11%
Mathematics 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2020.
All research outputs
#19,957,118
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#1,260
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,566
of 402,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#36
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.