Title |
MRI of the breast in patients with DCIS to exclude the presence of invasive disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Radiology, February 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00330-012-2394-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eline E. Deurloo, Jincey D. Sriram, Hendrik J. Teertstra, Claudette E. Loo, Jelle Wesseling, Emiel J. Th. Rutgers, Kenneth G. A. Gilhuijs |
Abstract |
Core biopsy underestimates invasion in more than 20% of patients with preoperatively diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) without evidence of invasion (pure DCIS). The aim of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to discriminate between patients with DCIS who are at high risk of invasive breast cancer and patients at low risk. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 28 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
Researcher | 5 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 16% |
Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 48% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2012.
All research outputs
#15,245,883
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#2,427
of 4,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,673
of 155,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.