@coach28373 @sjs856 The diagnostic criteria have changed a lot. If we applied more modern criteria to the original “1:10,000” study, the diagnosed rate would be much higher. https://t.co/fYAsJjeFfd
@SabinehazanMD Please post your response to this paper? And I encourage but do not expect the pseudoscience simps following you to read it. https://t.co/JoE4JZyMk0
@embodiedreason @stkirsch Currently, 1 in 36 children have autism in the U.S. That's up from 4 in every 10,000 in the mid-60s and 70s and 1 per 88 in 2008. As more vaccines are added to the schedule autism rates continue to rise. #AaronSiriAutismAttorney
@telesynth_hot @thereal_truther @NickHudsonCT https://t.co/jjRc3M2Ku0 https://t.co/EWy2jM44Wd what happened in 1988?
@reebmarktterb @SxarletRed @danrichman @Solidarity_Star the lack of diagnoses accounts for some, but not even remotely all, of the uptick. https://t.co/sAD6sqBRIv
@thehealthb0t “In the mid-1980s, researchers at the University of Utah and UCLA collaborated to conduct an autism epidemiology study of Utah. The reported prevalence of autism was 4 per 10,000” https://t.co/COAi4OwIgN
RT @MarcusBlimi: @TnUtah @PeterHotez And this study is pretty conclusive regarding changed criteria and increased diagnoses https://t.co/V…
@TnUtah @PeterHotez And this study is pretty conclusive regarding changed criteria and increased diagnoses https://t.co/VrcDhP1m33
@MarkRuffalo 11) But don’t take my word for it go ahead and check out reputable peer reviewed journals https://t.co/VVTFIE7fKZ or https://t.co/n0cvLUXQmQ
@voxvot again, misdiagnosed, undiagnosed. https://t.co/jCIWFmvCuC @WiringTheBrain @JayMan471
@voxvot https://t.co/jCIWFmvCuC you make this so easy. @WiringTheBrain @JayMan471
By today's #autism criteria, more with intellectual disability would have diagnosis than in 1980s http://t.co/Tq0Cet1Pku
59% of those labeled non-autistic in 80's wld get autism label today. RT @mosaicofminds http://t.co/WCLNYU6L7g
59% of those labeled non-autistic in 80's wld get autism label today. RT @mosaicofminds http://t.co/WCLNYU6L7g
59% of those labeled non-autistic in 80's wld get autism label today. RT @mosaicofminds http://t.co/WCLNYU6L7g
59% of those labeled non-autistic in 80's wld get autism label today. RT @mosaicofminds http://t.co/WCLNYU6L7g
59% of those labeled non-autistic in 80's wld get autism label today. RT @mosaicofminds http://t.co/WCLNYU6L7g
59% of those labeled non-autistic in 80's wld get autism label today--greatest increase for intellectually disabled http://t.co/hcENNCbdHS
RT @ABAcareerz: DSM-IV-TR criteria capture more individuals with ASD and intellectual disability than DSM III. http://t.co/O4rgCVzssg
RT @ABAcareerz: DSM-IV-TR criteria capture more individuals with ASD and intellectual disability than DSM III. http://t.co/1BRwse6S0i
DSM-IV-TR criteria capture more individuals with ASD and intellectual disability than DSM III. http://t.co/O4rgCVzssg
DSM-IV-TR criteria capture more individuals with ASD and intellectual disability than DSM III. http://t.co/O4rgCVzssg
@AutismRealityNB Hopefully you saw this study on the Utah autism numbers and intellectual disability: http://t.co/qu1p34zb
In re-do of 1980s study, meeting DSM-III autism criteria means higher IQ vs meeting DSM-IV (but not DSM-III) criteria http://j.mp/M7z74k