| Title |
Dysosmia and dysgeusia due to the 2019 Novel Coronavirus; a hypothesis that needs further investigation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40902-020-00254-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seied Omid Keyhan, Hamid Reza Fallahi, Behzad Cheshmi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Romania | 1 | 17% |
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 215 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 55 | 26% |
| Unknown | 57 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 42 | 20% |
| Unknown | 68 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,342,420
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#6
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,860
of 395,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them