↓ Skip to main content

Dysosmia and dysgeusia due to the 2019 Novel Coronavirus; a hypothesis that needs further investigation

Overview of attention for article published in Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
Title
Dysosmia and dysgeusia due to the 2019 Novel Coronavirus; a hypothesis that needs further investigation
Published in
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40902-020-00254-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seied Omid Keyhan, Hamid Reza Fallahi, Behzad Cheshmi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 202 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 17%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Other 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 51 25%
Unknown 49 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 62 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2020.
All research outputs
#9,755,108
of 18,234,522 outputs
Outputs from Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#10
of 49 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,347
of 284,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,234,522 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one scored the same or higher as 39 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them