↓ Skip to main content

GMO regulations and their interpretation: how EFSA’s guidance on risk assessments of GMOs is bound to fail

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Sciences Europe, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
GMO regulations and their interpretation: how EFSA’s guidance on risk assessments of GMOs is bound to fail
Published in
Environmental Sciences Europe, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12302-020-00325-6
Authors

Angelika Hilbeck, Hartmut Meyer, Brian Wynne, Erik Millstone

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Mathematics 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 7 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,304,583
of 17,011,884 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#62
of 401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,843
of 276,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,011,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them