↓ Skip to main content

Use of a vacuum-assisted closure system for the management of enteroatmospheric fistulae

Overview of attention for article published in Surgery Today, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Use of a vacuum-assisted closure system for the management of enteroatmospheric fistulae
Published in
Surgery Today, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00595-014-1020-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cengiz Tavusbay, Hudai Genc, Necat Cin, Haldun Kar, Erdinc Kamer, Kemal Atahan, Mehmet Haciyanli

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 31%
Other 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Unspecified 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 85%
Unspecified 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2016.
All research outputs
#9,146,118
of 10,422,489 outputs
Outputs from Surgery Today
#316
of 503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,318
of 276,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgery Today
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,422,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 503 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.