↓ Skip to main content

The experience of high-flow nasal cannula in hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in two hospitals of Chongqing, China

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 1,166)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
76 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
428 Mendeley
Title
The experience of high-flow nasal cannula in hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in two hospitals of Chongqing, China
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13613-020-00653-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ke Wang, Wei Zhao, Ji Li, Weiwei Shu, Jun Duan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 428 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 11%
Researcher 48 11%
Other 42 10%
Student > Master 33 8%
Student > Postgraduate 29 7%
Other 110 26%
Unknown 117 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 164 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 4%
Engineering 12 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 2%
Other 57 13%
Unknown 137 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 148. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2022.
All research outputs
#272,745
of 25,046,944 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#26
of 1,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,712
of 374,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,046,944 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.