↓ Skip to main content

Do direct-democratic procedures lead to higher acceptance than political representation?

Overview of attention for article published in Public Choice, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Do direct-democratic procedures lead to higher acceptance than political representation?
Published in
Public Choice, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11127-016-0330-y
Authors

Emanuel V. Towfigh, Sebastian J. Goerg, Andreas Glöckner, Philip Leifeld, Aniol Llorente-Saguer, Sophie Bade, Carlos Kurschilgen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 6%
Czechia 1 6%
Unknown 14 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 38%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Unspecified 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 56%
Unspecified 7 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,139,525
of 12,368,793 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#168
of 699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,470
of 270,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,368,793 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.