What makes you click?—Mate preferences in online dating

@israelsen I would suggest “What makes you click?” but it was taken in a different context (arguably a better title there…) https://t.co/gXh0f3Qwya

I know he’s getting dragged through the mud right now, but I liked this paper by Dan Ariely a lot https://t.co/FylPTlDq61

@notsoErudite How do you think this compares to publications on preferences for online dating? Do you think Bumble/apps have different preferences than 'traditional' online dating platforms? https://t.co/FNKwUSG9xj https://t.co/o9Da4AGigw

RT @SpringerSocSci: A decade ago, this resonant paper (https://t.co/7aSgzKg5S9) identified what men versus women seek when #onlinedating. B…

RT @SpringerSocSci: A decade ago, this resonant paper (https://t.co/7aSgzKg5S9) identified what men versus women seek when #onlinedating. B…

A decade ago, this resonant paper (https://t.co/7aSgzKg5S9) identified what men versus women seek when #onlinedating. Building on those findings, this new article exposes how men and women lie, in different ways, on their profiles: https://t.co/DYXB5WftdL

RT @Springernomics: Quantitative Marketing and #Economics's buzzy paper on on "mate preferences in online dating" (https://t.co/9df8wwI7n9)…

RT @Springernomics: Quantitative Marketing and #Economics's buzzy paper on on "mate preferences in online dating" (https://t.co/9df8wwI7n9)…

Quantitative Marketing and #Economics's buzzy paper on on "mate preferences in online dating" (https://t.co/9df8wwI7n9) + 2 articles from the Review of Economics of the Household inform this new take on post-marriage weight gain, from a Japanese POV: https

Tall tale....or brutal reality of #onlinedating? ["A (relatively old, 2010) study on online dating. There's a lot of data, but one of the most interesting is that a 1.67 man would have to have about 3 times the income to be as desirable as 1.82."]

En azından bir yönünün iyi olmasını beklemek ayıp değil bence mantıklı gayet. erkekler bunun dik alasını yapıyor, özellikle fiziksel ama başka birçok açıdan da

RT @0_hipotezi: Online dating ile ilgili (görece eski, 2010'da yayınlanmış) bir çalışma. Bir sürü veri var ama en ilginçlerden biri, 1.67'l…

1.57*

RT @0_hipotezi: Online dating ile ilgili (görece eski, 2010'da yayınlanmış) bir çalışma. Bir sürü veri var ama en ilginçlerden biri, 1.67'l…

Bence de abi 1.67'lik erkek mi olur

Online dating ile ilgili (görece eski, 2010'da yayınlanmış) bir çalışma. Bir sürü veri var ama en ilginçlerden biri, 1.67'lik bir erkeğin, 1.82'lik kadar istendik olması için yaklaşık 3 katı gelire sahip olması gerek. https://t.co/xU3RFNDCmQ https://t.co/

うろ覚えで正確な記憶じゃないけど、アジア系♀は相手の収入を犠牲にしてでもアジア系♂より白人♂を好むといった話にもなかなかダークなインプリケーションがある。 アジア系アメリカ人♀をよく思わないアジア系アメリカ人♂がそれなりにいる理由でもある。 https://t.co/ysjkX4KGGN

RT @EGordonMallin: On the eve of #valentinesday2021, thoughts turn to finding love💞...online. In one impactful study, invoked by @PsychToda…

On the eve of #valentinesday2021, thoughts turn to finding love💞...online. In one impactful study, invoked by @PsychToday & others, Quantitative #Marketing and #Economics discovered dating-app users behaved with a surprising lack of "strategy": https:/

RT @mixingale: 出会い系サイトのログデータ使って安定マッチングの成立を検証したHortacsuらの論文あるけどその前提作業の"性愛の好み"の推定部分だけを切り出してこのジャーナルに発表していたようだ。やはり似たもの同士、特に同人種スキーとの結果。＞http: ...

出会い系サイトのログデータ使って安定マッチングの成立を検証したHortacsuらの論文あるけどその前提作業の"性愛の好み"の推定部分だけを切り出してこのジャーナルに発表していたようだ。やはり似たもの同士、特に同人種スキーとの結果。＞http://t.co/GIJsYPSo