↓ Skip to main content

Paediatric haemodynamic modelling: development and experimental validation using quantitative flow MRI

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology Experimental, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Paediatric haemodynamic modelling: development and experimental validation using quantitative flow MRI
Published in
European Radiology Experimental, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41747-020-0146-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Parvin Mohammadyari, Giacomo Gadda, Angelo Taibi, Josep Munuera del Cerro

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 24%
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 47%
Engineering 4 24%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Other 2 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2020.
All research outputs
#13,758,289
of 17,932,315 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology Experimental
#108
of 138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,805
of 279,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology Experimental
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,932,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them