↓ Skip to main content

Restoring Northern Sierra Nevada Mixed Conifer Forest Composition and Structure with Prescribed Fires of Varying Intensities

Overview of attention for article published in Fire Ecology, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Restoring Northern Sierra Nevada Mixed Conifer Forest Composition and Structure with Prescribed Fires of Varying Intensities
Published in
Fire Ecology, December 2006
DOI 10.4996/fireecology.0202020
Authors

Lars Schmidt, Marco G. Hille, Scott L. Stephens

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 19%
Unknown 17 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 29%
Student > Master 5 24%
Other 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 38%
Mathematics 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,802,850
of 23,199,478 outputs
Outputs from Fire Ecology
#78
of 191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,894
of 157,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Ecology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,199,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them