| Title |
What Facilitates Return to Work? Patients Experiences 3 Years After Occupational Rehabilitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10926-011-9304-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liv Haugli, Silje Maeland, Liv H. Magnussen |
| Abstract |
We have limited knowledge about the specific elements in an occupational rehabilitation programme that facilitate the process leading to return to work (RTW) as perceived by the patients. The aim of the study was to explore individual experiences regarding contributing factors to a successful RTW, 3 years after a resident occupational rehabilitation programme. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 23% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 17% |
| Psychology | 14 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,399,513
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#74
of 612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,823
of 108,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.