| Title |
Scientific workflow systems: Pipeline Pilot and KNIME
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10822-012-9577-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wendy A. Warr |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Sweden | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Denmark | 1 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 214 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 56 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 31 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 52 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 28 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 9% |
| Engineering | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,075,061
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#95
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,667
of 178,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.