↓ Skip to main content

Eating from the wild: Turumbu, Mbole and Bali traditional knowledge on non-cultivated edible plants, District Tshopo, DRCongo

Overview of attention for article published in Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Eating from the wild: Turumbu, Mbole and Bali traditional knowledge on non-cultivated edible plants, District Tshopo, DRCongo
Published in
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10722-010-9602-4
Authors

Céline Termote, Patrick Van Damme, Benoît Dhed’a Djailo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Nigeria 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Burkina Faso 1 1%
Unknown 69 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 47%
Environmental Science 13 18%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Unspecified 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 13 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2016.
All research outputs
#4,765,029
of 8,806,948 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#222
of 301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,934
of 275,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,806,948 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.