| Title |
Eating from the wild: Turumbu, Mbole and Bali traditional knowledge on non-cultivated edible plants, District Tshopo, DRCongo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10722-010-9602-4 |
| Authors |
Céline Termote, Patrick Van Damme, Benoît Dhed’a Djailo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Burkina Faso | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2016.
All research outputs
#4,792,762
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#230
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,706
of 102,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.