↓ Skip to main content

Surgical options in oroantral fistula management: a narrative review

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Implant Dentistry, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Surgical options in oroantral fistula management: a narrative review
Published in
International Journal of Implant Dentistry, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40729-018-0152-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Puria Parvini, Karina Obreja, Robert Sader, Jürgen Becker, Frank Schwarz, Loutfi Salti

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Postgraduate 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Librarian 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 29 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 56%
Energy 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Materials Science 1 1%
Engineering 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 33 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,413,613
of 20,423,302 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Implant Dentistry
#10
of 84 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,306
of 281,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Implant Dentistry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,423,302 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them