| Title |
CT and MR imaging of cystic renal lesions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-019-0826-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesco Agnello, Domenico Albano, Giuseppe Micci, Giuseppe Di Buono, Antonino Agrusa, Giuseppe Salvaggio, Salvatore Pardo, Gianvincenzo Sparacia, Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta, Massimo Midiri, Roberto Lagalla, Massimo Galia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 27% |
| Mexico | 3 | 10% |
| Italy | 2 | 7% |
| Colombia | 2 | 7% |
| Argentina | 2 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Hungary | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 41 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 39 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,912,017
of 25,432,721 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#83
of 1,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,880
of 474,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,432,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.