| Title |
Impact of corticosteroid treatment on clinical outcomes of influenza-associated ARDS: a nationwide multicenter study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-0642-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ming-Ju Tsai, Kuang-Yao Yang, Ming-Cheng Chan, Kuo-Chin Kao, Hao-Chien Wang, Wann-Cherng Perng, Chieh-Liang Wu, Shinn-Jye Liang, Wen-Feng Fang, Jong-Rung Tsai, Wei-An Chang, Ying-Chun Chien, Wei-Chih Chen, Han-Chung Hu, Chiung-Yu Lin, Wen-Cheng Chao, Chau-Chyun Sheu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 21% |
| Mexico | 3 | 16% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Russia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 56% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,787,330
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#348
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,099
of 361,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#9
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.