↓ Skip to main content

Modeling effect of GABAergic current in a basal ganglia computational model

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Neurodynamics, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Modeling effect of GABAergic current in a basal ganglia computational model
Published in
Cognitive Neurodynamics, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11571-012-9203-3
Authors

Felix Njap, Jens Christian Claussen, Andreas Moser, Ulrich G. Hofmann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 11%
China 1 11%
Unknown 7 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 22%
Researcher 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 33%
Unspecified 2 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Neuroscience 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2013.
All research outputs
#8,410,332
of 13,426,363 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Neurodynamics
#71
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,378
of 121,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Neurodynamics
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,426,363 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.