↓ Skip to main content

Effective dose and image optimisation of lateral lumbar spine radiography: a phantom study

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology Experimental, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Effective dose and image optimisation of lateral lumbar spine radiography: a phantom study
Published in
European Radiology Experimental, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41747-019-0132-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zer Hau Lai, Cláudia Sá dos Reis, Zhonghua Sun

Abstract

To investigate lateral lumbar spine radiography technical parameters for reduction of effective dose whilst maintaining image quality (IQ). Thirty-six radiograms of an anthropomorphic phantom were acquired using different exposure parameters: source-to-detector distance (SDD) (100, 130 or 150 cm), tube potential (75, 85 or 95 kVp), tube current × exposure time product (4.5, 9, 18 mAs) and additional copper (Cu) filter (no filter, 0.1-, 0.2-, or 0.3-mm thickness. IQ was assessed using an objective approach (contrast-to-noise-ratio [CNR] calculation and magnification measurement) and a perceptual approach (six observers); ED was estimated using the PCXMC 2.0 software. Descriptive statistics, paired t test, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used. The highest ED (0.022 mSv) was found with 100 cm SSD, 75 kVp, 18 mAs, and without Cu filter, whilst the highest CNR (7.23) was achieved at 130 cm SSD, 75 kVp, 18 mAs, and without Cu filter. The lowest ED and CNR were generated at 150 cm SDD, 95 kVp, 4.5 mAs, and 0.3-mm Cu filter. All observers identified the relevant anatomical structures on all images with the lowest ED and IQ. The intra-observer (0.61-0.79) and inter-observer (0.55-0.82) ICC ranged from moderate to excellent. All relevant anatomical structures were identified on the lateral lumbar spine radiographs despite using low-dose protocols. The lowest ED (0.002 mSv) was obtained with 150 cm SDD, 95 kVp, 4.5 mAs, and 0.3-mm Cu filter. Further technical and clinical studies are needed to verify these preliminary findings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 20%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Master 4 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 5%
Other 2 3%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 29 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Physics and Astronomy 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 32 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2020.
All research outputs
#15,601,089
of 23,195,584 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology Experimental
#127
of 205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,314
of 456,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology Experimental
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,195,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.