↓ Skip to main content

A Phytopharmacological review of a Mediterranean plant: Lavandula stoechas L

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Phytoscience, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
A Phytopharmacological review of a Mediterranean plant: Lavandula stoechas L
Published in
Clinical Phytoscience, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40816-019-0142-y
Authors

Yassine Ez zoubi, Dalila Bousta, Abdellah Farah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 44 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 47 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#15,601,089
of 23,195,584 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Phytoscience
#31
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,789
of 456,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Phytoscience
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,195,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.