↓ Skip to main content

A Phytopharmacological review of a Mediterranean plant: Lavandula stoechas L

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Phytoscience, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
A Phytopharmacological review of a Mediterranean plant: Lavandula stoechas L
Published in
Clinical Phytoscience, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40816-019-0142-y
Authors

Yassine Ez zoubi, Dalila Bousta, Abdellah Farah

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 23 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 27 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#10,990,298
of 17,020,562 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Phytoscience
#12
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,641
of 262,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Phytoscience
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,020,562 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one scored the same or higher as 19 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them