↓ Skip to main content

EGFR T790M relative mutation purity predicts osimertinib treatment efficacy in non‐small cell lung cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Medicine, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
EGFR T790M relative mutation purity predicts osimertinib treatment efficacy in non‐small cell lung cancer patients
Published in
Clinical and Translational Medicine, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40169-020-0269-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qiufan Zheng, Shaodong Hong, Yan Huang, Hongyun Zhao, Yunpeng Yang, Xue Hou, Yuanyuan Zhao, Yuxiang Ma, Ting Zhou, Yaxiong Zhang, Wenfeng Fang, Li Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Master 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 13 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
#15,529,011
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#467
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,678
of 382,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.