↓ Skip to main content

Clearcuts and related secondary dieback undermine the ecological effectiveness of FSC certification in a boreal forest

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Processes, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 171)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Clearcuts and related secondary dieback undermine the ecological effectiveness of FSC certification in a boreal forest
Published in
Ecological Processes, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13717-020-0214-4
Authors

Jeanette Silvin Blumröder, Monika T. Hoffmann, Olga Ilina, Susanne Winter, Peter R. Hobson, Pierre L. Ibisch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Unknown 16 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,494,688
of 24,901,761 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Processes
#31
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,204
of 470,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Processes
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,901,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.