↓ Skip to main content

One-year natural course of corneal densitometry in high myopic patients after implantation of an implantable collamer lens (model V4c)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ophthalmology, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
One-year natural course of corneal densitometry in high myopic patients after implantation of an implantable collamer lens (model V4c)
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12886-020-1320-x
Authors

Chen, Xun, Shen, Yang, Xu, Haipeng, Wang, Xiaoying, Zhou, Xingtao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2020.
All research outputs
#9,106,926
of 14,501,879 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#405
of 983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,754
of 223,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,501,879 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 983 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them