| Title |
The clinical potential of gene editing as a tool to engineer cell‐based therapeutics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Medicine, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40169-020-0268-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Candice Ashmore‐Harris, Gilbert O. Fruhwirth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 31% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2021.
All research outputs
#14,611,205
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#378
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,523
of 469,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.