↓ Skip to main content

Robust tests for time-invariant individual heterogeneity versus dynamic state dependence

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Economics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Robust tests for time-invariant individual heterogeneity versus dynamic state dependence
Published in
Empirical Economics, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00181-013-0788-0
Authors

Federico Zincenko, Walter Sosa-Escudero, Gabriel Montes-Rojas

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,856,958
of 13,034,624 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Economics
#197
of 439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,244
of 265,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Economics
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,034,624 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 439 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.