↓ Skip to main content

Experimental evidence on biodiversity impacts of variable retention forestry, prescribed burning, and deadwood manipulation in Fennoscandia

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Processes, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 182)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Experimental evidence on biodiversity impacts of variable retention forestry, prescribed burning, and deadwood manipulation in Fennoscandia
Published in
Ecological Processes, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13717-019-0209-1
Authors

Matti Koivula, Ilkka Vanha-Majamaa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Master 10 11%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 39 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 24%
Environmental Science 15 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 43 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,193,136
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Processes
#28
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,086
of 477,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Processes
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.