↓ Skip to main content

Genetic reassortment between Sathuperi and Shamonda viruses of the genus Orthobunyavirus in nature: implications for their genetic relationship to Schmallenberg virus

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 2,883)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Genetic reassortment between Sathuperi and Shamonda viruses of the genus Orthobunyavirus in nature: implications for their genetic relationship to Schmallenberg virus
Published in
Archives of Virology, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00705-012-1341-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tohru Yanase, Tomoko Kato, Maki Aizawa, Yozo Shuto, Hiroaki Shirafuji, Makoto Yamakawa, Tomoyuki Tsuda

Abstract

The recent outbreak of malformations in ruminants in Northern Europe caused by Schmallenberg virus induced us to analyze the genetic properties of the related orthobunyaviruses and clarify their relationship. The sequencing of three genomic RNA segments of Sathuperi, Shamonda and Douglas viruses (SATV, SHAV and DOUV) revealed that the M RNA segment of SATV and DOUV had a high degree of sequence identity with that of Schmallenberg virus, but the S and L RNA segments closely matched those of SHAV. Phylogenetic analysis of the three genomic RNA segments indicated that Schmallenberg virus is a reassortant, with the M RNA segment from SATV and the S and L RNA segments from SHAV.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Vietnam 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 20%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Unspecified 4 7%
Other 17 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 38%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Unspecified 5 9%
Other 3 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2018.
All research outputs
#716,760
of 12,400,381 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#16
of 2,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,405
of 118,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,400,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.