| Title |
Identification and prioritization of critical success factors in faith-based and non-faith-based organizations’ humanitarian supply chain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41018-019-0067-6 |
| Authors |
Muhammad Azmat, Muhammad Atif, Sebastian Kummer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 22% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,157,283
of 24,707,218 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#98
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,393
of 470,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,707,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.