RT @trished: Funders' burden: more evidence needed #grantreview https://t.co/u2oMxuBrnF @sciencemag Try https://t.co/Q7M3OFU3iE & https://t…
RT @trished: Funders' burden: more evidence needed #grantreview https://t.co/u2oMxuBrnF @sciencemag Try https://t.co/Q7M3OFU3iE & https://t…
RT @trished: Funders' burden: more evidence needed #grantreview https://t.co/u2oMxuBrnF @sciencemag Try https://t.co/Q7M3OFU3iE & https://t…
RT @trished: Funders' burden: more evidence needed #grantreview https://t.co/u2oMxuBrnF @sciencemag Try https://t.co/Q7M3OFU3iE & https://t…
Funders' burden: more evidence needed #grantreview https://t.co/u2oMxuBrnF @sciencemag Try https://t.co/Q7M3OFU3iE & https://t.co/aAIGSgFupp
RT @peerrevcongress: This is a start: Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funders' and reviewers' perspectives ht…
This is a start: Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funders' and reviewers' perspectives https://t.co/sSe5AZq7A3 https://t.co/RRxHlghVGV
@DamianFog @NavTangri @dguerrot In this study we looked at workload/challenges in grant review http://t.co/B4HLhnX1zO
Will new #GlobalResearchCouncil be able to address any of the problems found by our surveys of funders and reviewers? http://t.co/OyjPP8GX