↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of different strategies in protecting enamel against demineralization during fixed orthodontic treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of different strategies in protecting enamel against demineralization during fixed orthodontic treatment
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00056-012-0072-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Knösel, L. Forslund, K. Jung, D. Ziebolz

Abstract

Sealant application is a common strategy for preventing enamel demineralization during multibracket treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy in enamel demineralization prevention of two fluoride-containing enamel varnishes compared to a non-fluoride varnish, weekly fluoride gel application, and a non-treated control group.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 10 59%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2012.
All research outputs
#8,250,091
of 13,156,493 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie
#34
of 67 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,909
of 120,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,156,493 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them