↓ Skip to main content

Femoral placement of a totally implantable venous access port with spontaneous catheter fracture: case report

Overview of attention for article published in CVIR Endovascular, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Femoral placement of a totally implantable venous access port with spontaneous catheter fracture: case report
Published in
CVIR Endovascular, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s42155-019-0094-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomohiro Kondo, Shigemi Matsumoto, Keitaro Doi, Motoo Nomura, Manabu Muto

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Professor 1 13%
Librarian 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#20,601,627
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from CVIR Endovascular
#326
of 328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#381,198
of 456,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CVIR Endovascular
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 328 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.