↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative recurrence results

Overview of attention for article published in Inventiones mathematicae, December 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Quantitative recurrence results
Published in
Inventiones mathematicae, December 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf01244320
Authors

Michael D. Boshernitzan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 3 30%
Engineering 2 20%
Computer Science 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2011.
All research outputs
#14,615,224
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Inventiones mathematicae
#771
of 1,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,609
of 71,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inventiones mathematicae
#12
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.