↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative recurrence results

Overview of attention for article published in Inventiones Mathematicae, December 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Quantitative recurrence results
Published in
Inventiones Mathematicae, December 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf01244320
Authors

Michael D. Boshernitzan

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 43%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 43%
Mathematics 3 43%
Engineering 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2011.
All research outputs
#1,404,507
of 3,628,118 outputs
Outputs from Inventiones Mathematicae
#119
of 165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,395
of 74,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inventiones Mathematicae
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,628,118 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 60th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.