↓ Skip to main content

Proper bootstrapping

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Proper bootstrapping
Published in
Synthese, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11229-012-0115-x
Authors

Igor Douven, Christoph Kelp

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 14%
Canada 1 7%
Unknown 11 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 21%
Student > Master 3 21%
Professor 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 6 43%
Unspecified 3 21%
Computer Science 2 14%
Mathematics 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Other 1 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2017.
All research outputs
#9,070,514
of 11,817,206 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#673
of 1,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,924
of 278,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#15
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,817,206 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,070 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.