↓ Skip to main content

Pedunculopontine Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation Improves Gait Disorder in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Neurochemical Research, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Pedunculopontine Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation Improves Gait Disorder in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Published in
Neurochemical Research, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s11064-020-02962-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabin Lin, Dihang Wu, Chenxin Lin, Huihui Cai, Lina Chen, Guofa Cai, Qinyong Ye, Guoen Cai

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2020.
All research outputs
#12,672,389
of 14,334,967 outputs
Outputs from Neurochemical Research
#1,178
of 1,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,713
of 185,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurochemical Research
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,334,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.