↓ Skip to main content

Open retromuscular versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair for medium-sized defects: where is the value?

Overview of attention for article published in Hernia, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
Title
Open retromuscular versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair for medium-sized defects: where is the value?
Published in
Hernia, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s10029-019-02114-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. J. Zolin, L. Tastaldi, H. Alkhatib, E. J. Lampert, K. Brown, A. Fafaj, C. C. Petro, A. S. Prabhu, M. J. Rosen, D. M. Krpata

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,290,735
of 14,334,967 outputs
Outputs from Hernia
#173
of 687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,047
of 186,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hernia
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,334,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 687 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.