↓ Skip to main content

Performance of a rapid two-sequence screening protocol for osteomyelitis of the foot

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Radiology, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
Title
Performance of a rapid two-sequence screening protocol for osteomyelitis of the foot
Published in
Skeletal Radiology, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s00256-019-03367-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam D. Singer, Monica Umpierrez, Aparna Kakarala, Marcos C. Schechter, Michael Maceroli, Gulshan B. Sharma, Ravi R. Rajani

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,170,376
of 14,334,967 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Radiology
#195
of 897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,266
of 188,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Radiology
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,334,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 897 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.