↓ Skip to main content

Identification of a small mutation panel of coding sequences to predict the efficacy of immunotherapy for lung adenocarcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
Title
Identification of a small mutation panel of coding sequences to predict the efficacy of immunotherapy for lung adenocarcinoma
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12967-019-02199-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Li, Wenbin Jiang, Tianhao Li, Mengyue Li, Xin Li, Zheyang Zhang, Sainan Zhang, Yixin Liu, Wenyuan Zhao, Yunyan Gu, Lishuang Qi, Lu Ao, Zheng Guo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2020.
All research outputs
#9,020,188
of 14,367,928 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,545
of 2,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,001
of 201,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,367,928 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them